Who needs good looking Democrats?
Oh, for God's sake. Comes now this article talking about how there's a bunch of good-looking Democratic candidates running for seats this midterm election, and hey, having a pretty face doesn't hurt, dontcha know.WTF is the Washington Post thinking, running a stupid article like this while we're dealing with important goddamm issues, really important ones? Who cares what people look like when the following is on our plate:
• Congressmen having monkey butt-sex with pages?• Madonna "adopting" a kid from Africa?
• Sara Evans (pictured) divorcing her husband because of a few lousy porno tapes?
These are the issues that matter! Not North Korea, or Iraq, or Iran, or the fucking UN, or AIDS in Africa, or any of that other shit. And certainly not whether a candidate is "good looking". Got it?
Full disclosure, though: Nancy Pelosi stirs my loins. Just a bit. In a Mrs. Robinson kinda way. I'd do her, but respectfully. She's going to be the next Speaker of the House, see, and you don't go forcing something like, say, a "Dirty Sanchez", or a "Cleveland Steamer" on her without at least asking for permission.
posted by Nigel St.John Regina Smegmatica Howle-Raines @ 9:50 PM
4 Comments:
You think you'll get permission for that?
And anyway, what's the point of a Dirty Sanchez if it's consentual?
I'm sure she'd like '2 in the pink and 1 in the stink' too.
Go for it, it'd make a change for a politician to have something up their arse instead of their own heads.
You're a sick man, which is why I really enjoy reading both your comments here and your blog.
Seriously, you should get an award or something!! Onya!!
Awww how lovely, ladies!
A regular ole love fest....
Seriously though, why would you blow your porno wad in just the filing papers....what else did her husband do to sweet little Sara?
And who WOULDN't want to be adopted by Madonna?
Thank you! I'm touched, no, I really am touched!
Post a Comment
<< Home